>>>>> "WF" == Wolfgang FRIEBEL writes: WF> there was a typo in the 3 lines to be included. The test on c must of WF> course not be >= 0 but > 0 only. It would even be better to get the salt WF> correct in the first place, i.e. at the place where salt->data is set. I corrected the patch when I checked it in for the 1.2.6 release; it checks that the pointer returned from strchr() is not NULL. ---Tom