I agree wholeheartedly. 

I will comment out the code that adds addresses and replace it with a 
properly constructed null-address list.

I will add a patch to the issue this afternoon.

- Jeff



Sam Hartman via RT wrote:

>HI, Jeff.  We are going to end up needing another beta for 1.3.  If
>you want to get this into 1.3 we probably can.  We would need a fix by
>Monday.
>
>
>After thinking about this more, I continue to believe the ticket
>should be addressless all the time in the MIT cache.  My previous
>reasons still apply, but I also believe that it is wrong to mark the
>ticket as addressful in the ccapi cache but not to actually add
>addresses to the encrypted part of the ticket.
>
>  
>