From bjaspan@MIT.EDU Thu Nov 7 15:17:17 1996 Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.72.1.2]) by rt-11.MIT.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA26635 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 15:17:16 -0500 Received: from DUN-DUN-NOODLES.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA17009; Thu, 7 Nov 96 15:17:16 EST Received: by DUN-DUN-NOODLES.MIT.EDU (5.x/4.7) id AA14351; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 15:17:13 -0500 Message-Id: <9611072017.AA14351@DUN-DUN-NOODLES.MIT.EDU> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 15:17:13 -0500 From: bjaspan@MIT.EDU Reply-To: bjaspan@MIT.EDU To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU Subject: old bugs in krb5-bugs in discuss meeting X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.99 >Number: 165 >Category: krb5-misc >Synopsis: old bugs in krb5-bugs in discuss meeting >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: low >Responsible: krb5-unassigned >State: closed >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: unknown >Arrival-Date: Thu Nov 07 15:18:01 EST 1996 >Last-Modified: Wed Apr 10 16:08:13 EDT 2002 >Originator: Barry Jaspan >Organization: mit >Release: 1.0-development >Environment: System: SunOS DUN-DUN-NOODLES 5.4 Generic_101945-37 sun4m sparc >Description: I just discovered at least two bugs that were logged in the krb5-bugs discuss meeting that were not re-logged into GNATS. At our recent bug tracking meeting, we only considered bugs already in GNATS, so I suspect all previous bugs are being ignored. This is bad. We should migrate all old bugs from the discuss meeting into GNATS, before the 1.0 release. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Audit-Trail: From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU, bjaspan@MIT.EDU Cc: krb5-unassigned@RT-11.MIT.EDU, gnats-admin@RT-11.MIT.EDU, krb5-prs@RT-11.MIT.EDU Subject: Re: krb5-misc/165: old bugs in krb5-bugs in discuss meeting Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 18:53:46 -0500 There are some 700-800 unclosed bugs in the old krb5-bugs discuss meeting. Figuring out which ones still apply is going to be a major job; a lot of them are moot. - Ted From: "Barry Jaspan" To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU, bjaspan@MIT.EDU, krb5-unassigned@RT-11.MIT.EDU, gnats-admin@RT-11.MIT.EDU, krb5-prs@RT-11.MIT.EDU Subject: Re: krb5-misc/165: old bugs in krb5-bugs in discuss meeting Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 13:10:08 -0500 In that case, perhaps the task list for krb5 1.1 should be nothing other than reviewing all the existing known bugs, deciding which ones are high priority, and fixing as many as possible in a reasonable release timeframe. Seriously, given that we have the bug reports, and now we have a decent means of tracking the bug reports, we should "clean up our act." Barry State-Changed-From-To: open-analyzed State-Changed-By: tlyu State-Changed-When: Mon Jul 7 21:16:33 1997 State-Changed-Why: Downgrading this a little; I've already done some work on this and am punting on the remainder while we clean up the rest of the bug database. State-Changed-From-To: analyzed-closed State-Changed-By: hartmans State-Changed-When: Wed Apr 10 16:08:06 2002 State-Changed-Why: queue evil laughter. >Unformatted: