From ptracy@nwu.edu Mon Oct 21 17:39:49 1996 Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28]) by rt-11.MIT.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA08134 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 17:39:49 -0400 Received: from grumpy.nsg.nwu.edu by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA04039; Mon, 21 Oct 96 17:39:46 EDT Received: from aquarius (aquarius.acns.nwu.edu [129.105.110.169]) by grumpy.nsg.nwu.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3/25.0) with SMTP id QAA12867 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 16:43:08 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <2.2.32.19961021213940.00908ea8@grumpy.nsg.nwu.edu> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 16:39:40 -0500 From: Phil Tracy To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU Subject: interest in NT version of K5 >Number: 126 >Category: pending >Synopsis: interest in NT version of K5 >Confidential: yes >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: gnats-admin >State: closed >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: unknown >Arrival-Date: Mon Oct e 17:40:00 EDT 1996 >Last-Modified: Wed Oct e 00:22:00 EDT 1996 >Originator: >Organization: >Release: >Environment: >Description: >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Audit-Trail: State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: tytso State-Changed-When: Wed Oct 23 00:19:10 1996 State-Changed-Why: Not a bug, request for info. From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU, Phil Tracy Cc: gnats-admin@RT-11.MIT.EDU, krb5-prs@RT-11.MIT.EDU Subject: Re: pending/126: interest in NT version of K5 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 00:21:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 16:39:40 -0500 From: Phil Tracy At any rate, I have an existing K4 application for which I'm trying to port the server portion to NT without much success, as John Miller's port appears to be incomplete as far as the libraries go. At this point, I'm willing to consider converting the application (client portion as well) to K5 instead of finishing the K4 NT port, assuming the K5 NT version will be more advanced than what I have with K4. Any info on the NT version of K5 is appreciated. I'm willing to try out beta stuff, but I'm not sure how useful that will be unless I have time to port the client half of my application to K5 also. Thanks. The NT code hasn't been folded into our main sources yet, so it's not quite ready for me to release yet. When it is ready (which will hopefully be within a week or so --- the person doing the merged has promised to get to it soon), I'll be able send you our a pre-release snapshot. I'll put you on the list of people who should be notified when it is ready. - Ted >Unformatted: I saw a reference in the announcement indicating I should contact "Ted" if interested in the NT version of Kerberos. I am interested, but I don't have an address for Ted, so sorry if this goes to the wrong person. At any rate, I have an existing K4 application for which I'm trying to port the server portion to NT without much success, as John Miller's port appears to be incomplete as far as the libraries go. At this point, I'm willing to consider converting the application (client portion as well) to K5 instead of finishing the K4 NT port, assuming the K5 NT version will be more advanced than what I have with K4. Any info on the NT version of K5 is appreciated. I'm willing to try out beta stuff, but I'm not sure how useful that will be unless I have time to port the client half of my application to K5 also. Thanks. - Phil -- Phillip Tracy Northwestern University ACNS, Evanston, IL USA http://grumpy.nsg.nwu.edu/tracy/philtracy.html