From dsr@lnscu5.lns.cornell.edu  Fri Feb 22 15:01:44 2002
Received: from pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.83])
	by rt-11.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA20869
	for <bugs@RT-11.mit.edu>; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:01:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lnscu5.lns.cornell.edu (lnscu5.lns.cornell.edu [128.84.44.111])
	by pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id PAA22719
	for <krb5-bugs@mit.edu>; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:01:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lnscu6.lns.cornell.edu (lnscu6.lns.cornell.edu [128.84.45.151])
	by lnscu5.lns.cornell.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g1MK1ho2012975
	for <krb5-bugs@mit.edu>; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:01:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: by lnscu6.lns.cornell.edu (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/15Feb00-0854AM)
	id PAA0000019878; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:01:43 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200202222001.PAA0000019878@lnscu6.lns.cornell.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:01:43 -0500 (EST)
From: Dan Riley <dsr@mail.lns.cornell.edu>
Reply-To: dsr@mail.lns.cornell.edu
To: krb5-bugs@mit.edu
Subject: printf argument mismatches in rpc unit tests
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.99

>Number:         1066
>Category:       krb5-libs
>Synopsis:       printf argument mismatches in rpc unit tests
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    krb5-unassigned
>State:          closed
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   unknown
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Feb 22 15:02:01 EST 2002
>Last-Modified:  Sun Apr  7 19:09:38 EDT 2002
>Originator:     Dan Riley
>Organization:
LNS, Cornell U.
>Release:        krb5-1.2.3
>Environment:
System: OSF1 lnscu6.lns.cornell.edu V4.0 1229 alpha
Machine: alpha
>Description:
Two of the fprintf's in the rpc unit tests have argument mismatches.
>How-To-Repeat:
Compile with a very picky compiler and read the warnings (the Tru64
5.1 cc, for instance).
>Fix:
diff -ur krb5-1.2.3/src/lib/rpc/unit-test/client.c krb5/lib/rpc/unit-test/client.c
--- krb5-1.2.3/src/lib/rpc/unit-test/client.c	Wed Jan  9 17:27:59 2002
+++ krb5/lib/rpc/unit-test/client.c	Thu Dec  6 13:01:48 2001
@@ -217,7 +223,7 @@
 	  if (strncmp(*echo_resp, "Echo: ", 6) &&
 	      strcmp(echo_arg, (*echo_resp) + 6) != 0)
 	       fprintf(stderr, "RPC_TEST_ECHO call %d response wrong: "
-		       "arg = %s, resp = %s\n", echo_arg, *echo_resp);
+		       "arg = %s, resp = %s\n", i, echo_arg, *echo_resp);
 	  gssrpc_xdr_free(xdr_wrapstring, echo_resp);
      }
 
@@ -323,7 +329,7 @@
 	       if (strncmp(*echo_resp, "Echo: ", 6) &&
 		   strcmp(echo_arg, (*echo_resp) + 6) != 0)
 		    fprintf(stderr,
-			    "RPC_TEST_LENGTHS call %d response wrong\n");
+			    "RPC_TEST_LENGTHS call %d response wrong\n", i);
 	       gssrpc_xdr_free(xdr_wrapstring, echo_resp);
 	  }
 	  
>Audit-Trail:

State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: hartmans
State-Changed-When: Sun Apr  7 19:08:57 2002
State-Changed-Why:
This bug does appear to be fixed in our development code; I will probably
not be pulled into to a 1.2.x release of Kerberos, but should be in 1.3.

>Unformatted: