From pzi@netmediatech.com Fri Jan 3 16:51:39 1997 Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.72.1.2]) by rt-11.MIT.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA07311 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 1997 16:51:38 -0500 Received: from netmediatech.com by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA19195; Fri, 3 Jan 97 14:39:53 EST Received: from tech.netmediatech.com ([207.34.208.139]) by media.netmediatech.com with ESMTP id <43258-9579>; Fri, 3 Jan 1997 14:41:16 -0500 Received: by tech.netmediatech.com id <233554-128>; Fri, 3 Jan 1997 14:40:57 -0500 Message-Id: <97Jan3.144057-0500_est.233554-128+1@tech.netmediatech.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 1997 14:40:46 -0500 From: pzi@netmediatech.com Sender: Peter Ziobrzynski Reply-To: pzi@netmediatech.com To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU Cc: kerberos@MIT.EDU Subject: bug in kdb5_util create X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.99 >Number: 331 >Category: krb5-kdc >Synopsis: bug in kdb5_util create >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: gjking >State: closed >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: unknown >Arrival-Date: Fri Jan 03 16:52:00 EST 1997 >Last-Modified: Thu Apr 18 11:14:21 EDT 2002 >Originator: Peter Ziobrzynski >Organization: Peter Ziobrzynski, pzi@netmediatech.com >Release: 1.0 >Environment: i586, Linux Slackware96, System: Linux tech.netmediatech.com 2.0.23 #3 Mon Nov 11 17:14:24 GMT 1996 i586 Architecture: i586 >Description: Well, the time came to upgrade from beta 7 to 1.0 and I stumbled over a bug in kdb5_uil (I think). When creating KDC database with: % kdb5_util create -r NETMEDIATECH.COM -s the kdb_util ignores the kdc.conf database_name directive: [realms] NETMEDIATECH.COM = { database_name = /usr/local/kerberos/lib/krb5kdc/principal ... } and creates the database in /usr/local/kerberos/var/krb5kdc/principal. (note it went into var and not lib subdirectory). >How-To-Repeat: Specify database_name directive in kdc.conf that is different then /var/krb5kdc/principal. >Fix: >Audit-Trail: State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: hartmans State-Changed-When: Thu Apr 18 11:14:13 2002 State-Changed-Why: I know this works with 1.2.x. >Unformatted: