Jeffrey Altman via RT <rt@krbdev.mit.edu> wrote:
> ""Christopher D. Clausen" via RT" wrote:
>> I would assume that it is possible to check the version number of
>> Kerberos.dll and make sure it is equal to or newer than the version
>> in the KB article.
>
> Not a safe assumption either.   The Vista SP1 Beta 1 kerberos.dll has
> a later version number than the hotfix.  You need to know what is in
> each version.

Hmm... would it be better to maintain a list of known bad versions?

<<CDC