Tom Yu via RT wrote:
>>>>>> "jaltman" == Jeffrey Altman via RT <rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu> writes:
>
> jaltman> +    if (ktype == -1)
> jaltman> +        keyblock->enctype = ktype;
>
> Isn't this backwards if you want -1 to mean the enctype doesn't get
> coerced?
>
You are correct.  I manually copied the patch backward.  The problem
with manually pulling patches by eyeballing them from other systems. 
Corrected patch:

Index: svr_principal.c

===================================================================

--- svr_principal.c     (revision 20163)

+++ svr_principal.c     (working copy)

@@ -2156,7 +2156,8 @@

      * inexact match on the enctype; this behavior will go away when

      * the key storage architecture gets redesigned for 1.3.

      */

-    keyblock->enctype = ktype;

+    if (ktype != -1)

+        keyblock->enctype = ktype;

     if (kvnop)

         *kvnop = key_data->key_data_kvno;