Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.411 (Entity 5.404) X-RT-Original-Encoding: iso-8859-1 Content-Length: 3396 From bjaspan@MIT.EDU Tue Nov 26 16:55:03 1996 Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.72.1.2]) by rt-11.MIT.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA18441 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 16:55:03 -0500 Received: from THE-TICK.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA25830; Tue, 26 Nov 96 16:55:01 EST Received: by the-tick.MIT.EDU (940816.SGI.8.6.9/4.7) id VAA21440; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 21:55:00 GMT Message-Id: <199611262155.VAA21440@the-tick.MIT.EDU> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 21:55:00 GMT From: bjaspan@MIT.EDU Reply-To: bjaspan@MIT.EDU To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU, krbdev@MIT.EDU Subject: binary distributions don't contain krb5.conf or kdc.conf X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.99 >Number: 249 >Category: krb5-build >Synopsis: binary distributions don't contain krb5.conf or kdc.conf >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: tlyu >State: open >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: unknown >Arrival-Date: Tue Nov 26 16:56:01 EST 1996 >Last-Modified: Fri Nov 29 19:58:49 EST 1996 >Originator: Barry Jaspan >Organization: mit >Release: 1.0-development >Environment: System: IRIX the-tick 5.3 02091401 IP22 mips >Description: A binary distribution created according to the build-instructions file does not end up containing a sample krb5.conf and kdc.conf. Given that the major purpose of the binary distributions is to make it very easy to sample krb5, this is unfortunate. The install rule in src/config-files, which already exists, could easily install the sample files in, say, share/config-files. Comments on priority? >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Audit-Trail: From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU, bjaspan@MIT.EDU Cc: tlyu@MIT.EDU, gnats-admin@RT-11.MIT.EDU, krb5-prs@RT-11.MIT.EDU Subject: Re: krb5-build/249: binary distributions don't contain krb5.conf or kdc.conf Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 22:03:11 -0500 Actually, I'm beginning to think the right answer is for the sample configuration files to go into the *documentation* tree. My proposal is for the 1.0 release, to add a new directory, doc/sample-config-files containing the sample configuration files into the documentation tree, and then after the 1.0 release, we'll remove krb5.conf, kdc.conf, and services.append from src/config-files. Comments? - Ted From: "Barry Jaspan" To: tytso@MIT.EDU Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU, tlyu@MIT.EDU, gnats-admin@rt-11.MIT.EDU, krb5-prs@rt-11.MIT.EDU Subject: Re: krb5-build/249: binary distributions don't contain krb5.conf or kdc.conf Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 17:24:39 GMT Actually, I'm beginning to think the right answer is for the sample configuration files to go into the *documentation* tree. That sound's sensible. Barry ( Forwarded from [250] ) From: Ezra Peisach Subject: Re: binary distributions don't contain krb5.conf or kdc.conf To: bjaspan@MIT.EDU Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU, krbdev@MIT.EDU Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 17:01:32 EST I really would prefer not having to change the tarball... Question: Would the sample files be appropriate to install in share/config-files? Would we be better off providing next to the binary distribution a tarball containing these shared files? (And indicate that users should get both - at least for this release). Ezra >Unformatted: