Received: from nmta1.jpl.nasa.gov (nmta.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.160.214]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3p2) with ESMTP id PAA27687; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:20:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from xmta2.jpl.nasa.gov (xmta2.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.160.56]) by nmta1.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.1.9/Switch-3.1.9) with ESMTP id kB1KJSOi030259 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:19:28 -0800 Received: from [137.78.61.96] (laphotz.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.61.96]) by xmta2.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.1.9/Switch-3.1.9) with ESMTP id kB1KJRVG024253 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:19:28 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <2B2F3CA4-5C9B-4668-807A-CF6829CAF7D6@jpl.nasa.gov> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Henry B. Hotz" Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #4108] Problems with 1.5 on Solaris 9 w gcc Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:19:26 -0800 To: rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Source-Ip: laphotz.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.61.96] X-Source-Sender: hotz@jpl.nasa.gov X-Auth: Authorized RT-Send-Cc: X-RT-Original-Encoding: us-ascii Content-Length: 755 On Dec 1, 2006, at 9:27 AM, Tom Yu via RT wrote: > This sounds like an old problem with the Solaris 9 pty driver. Do you > have patch 117171-11 (or later rev of that patch) applied? Is > PRICNTL_HACK=1 in the arguments to runtest when you run "make check"? I have patch 117171-17 installed. (Also -07, and a patch which obsoletes -10, not that they matter.) I don't have a record handy, but I'm pretty sure I didn't give "make check" any special arguments to cause that. I suppose you'd like to recheck this, right? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The opinions expressed in this message are mine, not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government. Henry.B.Hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz@oxy.edu