Received: from carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3p2) with ESMTP id OAA28943; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:43:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id C0D1EE00B3; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:43:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
To: rt@krbdev.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #5233] Change in behaviour in gss_release_buffer() by  mechtypes introduces memory leak
References: <rt-5233-21706.7.1328745435509@krbdev.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:43:51 -0500
In-Reply-To: <rt-5233-21706.7.1328745435509@krbdev.mit.edu> (Ezra Peisach via's message of "Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:27:06 -0500 (EST)")
Message-Id: <tslr6uiebd4.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
RT-Send-Cc: 
X-RT-Original-Encoding: us-ascii
Content-Length: 192

Note that callers should not be releasing buffers that they allocated.
So I think we need only be consistent within our implementation and
within mechanisms that plug into our implementation.