Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (dhcp-18-188-10-61.dyn.mit.edu [18.188.10.61]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.12.9) with ESMTP id l6HKpAHW024969; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:51:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id BCD6C4A3F; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:51:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
To: rt@krbdev.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #5596] patch for providing a way to set the  ok-as-delegate flag
References: <rt-5596-23964.17.7307179242321@krbdev.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:51:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <rt-5596-23964.17.7307179242321@krbdev.mit.edu> (rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu's message of "Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:27:15 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-ID: <tslhco2pxdu.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
RT-Send-Cc: 
X-RT-Original-Encoding: us-ascii
Content-Length: 803

>>>>> "nalin@redhat" == nalin@redhat com via RT <rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu> writes:

    nalin@redhat> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:11:28PM -0400, Sam
    nalin@redhat> Hartman via RT wrote:
    >> Note that this is related to a similar issue that we've
    >> received from Sandia.  We should look at both in conjunction
    >> and should try to deal with both soon.

    nalin@redhat> I have to confess that I'm not really familiar with
    nalin@redhat> using RT.  Do you mean #2940?  I steered clear of
    nalin@redhat> touching client libraries because I didn't think
    nalin@redhat> that always delegating credentials when the flag was
    nalin@redhat> set would be a popular idea.

IT would not.  I think I have something more recent than 2940 outside
of rt.  Will attemmpt to attach it here.