Received: from smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.213]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.12.9) with SMTP id l9G3QZHW020604; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:26:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 72736 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2007 03:26:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO CDCHOME) (chrisclausen@sbcglobal.net@76.199.12.124 with login) by smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 2007 03:26:28 -0000 X-Ymail-Osg: qfpbOv4VM1mLwnTbeJmvhcGMKsZzLZzP5VNiOGFDnc.njx3aoRMaskxj8fEJE.sasicpQUw7CQ-- Message-ID: <8C161805B39544E39A872F069F6DBDA8@CDCHOME> From: "Christopher D. Clausen" To: References: Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #5462] Vista no longer returns enctype 0 forunavailable session keys Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:25:59 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.3959 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4133 X-Rfc2646: Format=Flowed; Original RT-Send-Cc: X-RT-Original-Encoding: iso-8859-1 Content-Length: 1148 mayer@ntp.isc.org via RT wrote: > Jeffrey Altman via RT wrote: >> [jaltman - Tue Sep 4 14:39:20 2007]: >>> Vista SP1 beta will be available to select testers within the next >>> two weeks. >> >> Vista SP1 Beta 1 does not contain any changes in this area. >> >> The open issue with Microsoft is SRQ070322604363 and the hot fix for >> Vista RTM is KB 942219. >> >> There is no runtime test that can be performed to determine if the >> hot fix is applied. When the hotfix becomes widely available we are >> going to have to use either a Windows build number test or attempt to >> enumerate the installed update list. > > Historically, Hotfixes ended up creating a folder in the Windows > directory called $NtUninstallKB873339$. Is that no longer true with > Vista? I could have sworn that it also added it to the registry but I > can't find where. One should not assume those exist. I for one delete such directories to save disk space before cloning systems. I would assume that it is possible to check the version number of Kerberos.dll and make sure it is equal to or newer than the version in the KB article. <