Received: from smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.213]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.12.9) with SMTP id l9G4saHW020705; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:54:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 25356 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2007 04:54:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO CDCHOME) (chrisclausen@sbcglobal.net@76.199.12.124 with login) by smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 2007 04:54:30 -0000
X-Ymail-Osg: XVMTyw4VM1lG4wK_lRlg8bqS09tHzlXKU7p9rH7Tl7bpaWTKuh6J_fAHGg9WXC0maA7YwhDkOA--
Message-ID: <BACC4C215595428596651D5F1B56D3E2@CDCHOME>
From: "Christopher D. Clausen" <cclausen@acm.org>
To: <rt@krbdev.mit.edu>
References: <rt-5462-25562.14.6787206089537@krbdev.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #5462] Vista no longer returns enctype 0forunavailable session keys
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:50:57 -0500
X-Priority: 3
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.3959
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4133
X-Rfc2646: Format=Flowed; Original
RT-Send-Cc: 
X-RT-Original-Encoding: iso-8859-1
Content-Length: 494

Jeffrey Altman via RT <rt@krbdev.mit.edu> wrote:
> ""Christopher D. Clausen" via RT" wrote:
>> I would assume that it is possible to check the version number of
>> Kerberos.dll and make sure it is equal to or newer than the version
>> in the KB article.
>
> Not a safe assumption either.   The Vista SP1 Beta 1 kerberos.dll has
> a later version number than the hotfix.  You need to know what is in
> each version.

Hmm... would it be better to maintain a list of known bad versions?

<<CDC