Received: from pch.mit.edu (PCH.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.90]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.12.9) with ESMTP id m5K5e3HW027394; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:40:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pch.mit.edu (pch.mit.edu [127.0.0.1]) by pch.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id m5K5dwW4028842; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:39:58 -0400 Received: from fort-point-station.mit.edu (FORT-POINT-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.76]) by pch.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id m5JMNmwY016905 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:23:48 -0400 Received: from mit.edu (W92-130-BARRACUDA-3.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.224]) by fort-point-station.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id m5JMNdjU013039 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:23:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gentzen.megacz.com. (gentzen.megacz.com [65.23.129.159]) by mit.edu (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 0F47DFEFF60 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:23:18 -0400 (EDT) Envelope-To: krb5-bugs@mit.edu Received: from localhost (GENTZEN.MEGACZ.COM) by megacz.com (org.ibex.mail.SMTP) with SMTP for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:23:00 -0700 Received: by gentzen.megacz.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:22:59 -0700 From: Adam Megacz To: jaltman@secure-endpoints.com Subject: patch inclusion status? Organization: Myself References: <200703120511.AAA11265@quince.ifs.umich.edu> <1E393FB5-8557-4BBE-8896-5FCE67A6F41D@mit.edu> <47F27167.3090706@secure-endpoints.com> X-Home-Page: http://www.megacz.com/ Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:22:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: <47F27167.3090706@secure-endpoints.com> (Jeffrey Altman's message of "Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:31:19 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: 0.12 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Scanned-BY: MIMEDefang 2.42 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:39:56 -0400 CC: krb5-bugs@mit.edu X-Beenthere: krb5-bugs-incoming@mailman.mit.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 Precedence: list Sender: krb5-bugs-incoming-bounces@PCH.MIT.EDU Errors-To: krb5-bugs-incoming-bounces@PCH.MIT.EDU X-RT-Original-Encoding: us-ascii Content-Length: 739 Regarding this patch: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerberos/2008-March/013327.html Jeffrey Altman writes: > Adam Megacz wrote: >> Hi, would it be possible for the Kerberos maintainers to consider the >> patch below for inclusion in the main libkadm5 distribution? >> >> - a > Adam: > > I already forwarded your patch to krb5-bugs@mit.edu on your behalf. Is there any way I can track the status of this matter? The patch does not seem to have been applied to the development tree (I checked the snapshot two days ago). If the patch needs to be revised, I would be happy to do so. It would be nice to see it included in the next release, unless there is some objection to it. Thank you! - a