Received: from konishi-polis.mit.edu (KONISHI-POLIS.MIT.EDU [18.18.3.10]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA19780; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 15:09:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: by konishi-polis.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id A3A48152307; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 15:09:29 -0500 (EST)
To: rt@krbdev.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #1324] cannot reproduce
References: <rt-1324-4002.2.29265662822357@krbdev.mit.edu>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 15:09:29 -0500
In-Reply-To: <rt-1324-4002.2.29265662822357@krbdev.mit.edu> ("Jered Floyd via RT"'s message of "Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:55:01 -0500 (EST)")
Message-Id: <tslwukytgcm.fsf@konishi-polis.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
RT-Send-Cc: 
X-RT-Original-Encoding: us-ascii
Content-Length: 223


No matching key in entry means that you included an encrypted
timestamp with an enctype that the KDC couldn't find for the key.  Do
principals that work have a different set of encryption types than
principals that fail?