Received: from konishi-polis.mit.edu (STRATTON-ONE-NINETY-SEVEN.MIT.EDU [18.187.5.197]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA22012; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 15:54:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by konishi-polis.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 2273115226A; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 15:54:18 -0400 (EDT)
To: rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu
Cc: krb5-prs@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #1415] subkey fubar description
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 15:54:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <rt-1415-5755.7.40914179458699@krbdev.mit.edu> (Tom Yu via's message of "Wed, 16 Apr 2003 19:40:59 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-Id: <tslel40hpcl.fsf@konishi-polis.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090017 (Oort Gnus v0.17) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)
References: <rt-1415-5755.7.40914179458699@krbdev.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
RT-Send-Cc: 
X-RT-Original-Encoding: us-ascii
Content-Length: 263

I think that for 1.3 we want to change the code such that server
subkey wins by default as I don't think that will break anything if
the server subkey is the same as the client subkey.  I'm not sure how
we get to a point where we generate server subkeys though.