Received: from pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.83]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA11985; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:15:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from grand-central-station.mit.edu (GRAND-CENTRAL-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.82]) by pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h3O1Fmxe010036; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:15:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from manawatu-mail-centre.mit.edu (MANAWATU-MAIL-CENTRE.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.71]) by grand-central-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h3O1Fm3C026658; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:15:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from all-in-one.mit.edu (ALL-IN-ONE.MIT.EDU [18.18.1.71]) ) by manawatu-mail-centre.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h3O1FmFJ007359; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:15:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from raeburn@localhost) by all-in-one.mit.edu (8.9.3) id VAA25102; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:15:48 -0400
To: rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu
Cc: krb5-prs@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #1435] cygwin does not have inet_ntop when compiling kdc
References: <rt-1435-5797.6.36221463972959@krbdev.mit.edu>
From: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:15:48 -0400
In-Reply-To: <rt-1435-5797.6.36221463972959@krbdev.mit.edu> ("The RT System itself via RT"'s message of "Sun, 20 Apr 2003 19:42:30 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-Id: <tx1k7dksnjv.fsf@mit.edu>
Lines: 8
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
RT-Send-Cc: 
X-RT-Original-Encoding: us-ascii
Content-Length: 287

If changes are needed in that many places, I'd rather have
port-sockets.h provide an inline version of inet_ntop, to keep the KDC
code simpler, that calls sprintf, since inet_ntoa isn't thread-safe.

Does Cygwin support IPv6 currently?
Do we need to worry about AF_INET6 addresses?

Ken