Received: from marionberry.cc.columbia.edu (IDENT:cu41754@marionberry.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.100]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA21147; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:34:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from columbia.edu (iam-82.iamx.com [166.84.156.82]) (user=jaltman mech=PLAIN bits=0) by marionberry.cc.columbia.edu (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h5AHYG7C003688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:34:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3EE6169B.40405@columbia.edu> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:34:19 -0700 From: "Jeffrey Altman [Kermit Project]" Organization: The Kermit Project at Columbia University in the City of New York User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030525 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu Cc: jaltman@mit.edu, krb5-prs@mit.edu Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #1586]krb4 credentails structures References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-No-Spam-Score: Local X-Scanned-BY: MIMEDefang 2.32 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) RT-Send-Cc: X-RT-Original-Encoding: us-ascii Content-Length: 427 How would it break the ABI? The changes are Windows only. The Krb5 Krb4 library is not supported (nor shipped) on Windows at the present time. Sam Hartman via RT wrote: > It sounds like this would break the ABI for programs developed against > the krb4 library shipped in the krb5 source tree. > > While we may end up breaking that ABI when we do the merge, doing so this late in the 1.3 release cycle seems wrong. >