Received: from jalapeno.cc.columbia.edu (IDENT:cu41754@jalapeno.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.238]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA21181; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:24:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from columbia.edu (iam-82.iamx.com [166.84.156.82]) (user=jaltman mech=PLAIN bits=0) by jalapeno.cc.columbia.edu (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h5AIOVDH001853 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:24:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3EE62263.3020801@columbia.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:24:35 -0700
From: "Jeffrey Altman [Kermit Project]" <jaltman@columbia.edu>
Organization: The Kermit Project at Columbia University in the City of New York
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030525
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
Cc: rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu, jaltman@mit.edu, krb5-prs@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #1586]krb4 credentails structures
References: <rt-1586-6858.7.49314854368052@krbdev.mit.edu>	<3EE6169B.40405@columbia.edu> <tsl65ndaj56.fsf@konishi-polis.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tsl65ndaj56.fsf@konishi-polis.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-No-Spam-Score: Local
X-Scanned-BY: MIMEDefang 2.32 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
RT-Send-Cc: 
X-RT-Original-Encoding: us-ascii
Content-Length: 1514

I am still investigating the problem.  The problem is not really caused 
by the fact the CREDENTIALS definition is different in KRB5_32.DLL or 
KRB4_32.DLL.  The problem is that building Leash has a conflict with 
attempting to bring in the correct header file since they have the same 
names.

I am still not sure whether or not that is the problem.  I am still 
investigating.



Sam Hartman wrote:

>>>>>>"Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Altman [Kermit Project] <Jeffrey> writes:
> 
> 
>     Jeffrey> How would it break the ABI?  The changes are Windows
>     Jeffrey> only. The Krb5 Krb4 library is not supported (nor
>     Jeffrey> shipped) on Windows at the present time.
> 
> 
> It's a little unclear to mea how much the krb5 krb4 library is or is
> not supported on Windows.  You yourself said that you had implemented
> support for this library in Kermit because people were using it.
> 
> KFW does not ship this library, but the krb5 sources do support
> building outside the KFW framework on Windows and in that
> configuration do build the library.
> 
> 
> When we contemplated the krb524 change, you were asked to review
> whether the difference in the credential structure would be a problem.
> You said that because the KFW krb4 library had a larger credentials
> structure and that because it was allocated by the caller, no problem
> would result.
> 
> The fact that we were concerned about the difference in the
> credentials structure suggests to me that we are at least reluctant to
> change it for 1.3.