Received: from cathode-dark-space.mit.edu (CATHODE-DARK-SPACE.MIT.EDU [18.18.1.96]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA06572; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 15:04:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from tlyu@localhost) by cathode-dark-space.mit.edu (8.9.3p2) id PAA01226; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 15:04:28 -0400 (EDT) To: rt@krbdev.mit.edu Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #1656] References: From: Tom Yu Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 15:04:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: ("Kent_Wu@trendmicro.com via RT"'s message of "Wed, 9 Jul 2003 16:41:51 -0400 (EDT)") Message-Id: Lines: 26 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii RT-Send-Cc: X-RT-Original-Encoding: us-ascii Content-Length: 879 >>>>> "Kent" == Kent Wu@trendmicro com via RT writes: Kent> Not sure what you meant but I'm following up with #1601. Kent> Kent Kent> -----Original Message----- Kent> From: rt@krbdev.mit.edu [mailto:rt@krbdev.mit.edu] Kent> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 1:39 PM Kent> To: Kent Wu (RD-US) Kent> Subject: No ticket id specified Kent> comment aliases require a TicketId to work on This means that you sent to rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu without a valid ticket ID in the "Subject:" header. Sending to rt-krb5@krbdev.mit.edu would have opened a new ticket. It's probably correct to open a new ticket for this, though, as it is a new issue. It is important to retain the ticket ID string (in this case, [krbdev.mit.edu #1656] ) in the subject to avoid confusing RT. Anyway, are you passing in GSS_C_NO_CREDENTIAL to gss_init_sec_context()? ---Tom