Received: from fort-point-station.mit.edu (FORT-POINT-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.76]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3p2) with ESMTP id RAA17243; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:40:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (CENTRAL-CITY-CARRIER-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.72]) by fort-point-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h8PLeadn001100 for <rt-comment@krbdev.MIT.EDU>; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:40:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (MELBOURNE-CITY-STREET.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.86]) by central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h8PLeaL2000711; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:40:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from all-in-one.mit.edu (ALL-IN-ONE.MIT.EDU [18.18.1.71]) ) by melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h8PLea5W010953; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:40:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from raeburn@localhost) by all-in-one.mit.edu (8.12.9) id h8PLeZix024415; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:40:35 -0400
To: rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #1792] sparc-solaris9 nightly build test failures: kadm5 api
References: <rt-1792-8364.3.74172928723922@krbdev.mit.edu>
From: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:40:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: <rt-1792-8364.3.74172928723922@krbdev.mit.edu> (Tom Yu via's message of "Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:56:38 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-Id: <tx1u170eecs.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
RT-Send-Cc: 
X-RT-Original-Encoding: us-ascii
Content-Length: 716

"Tom Yu via RT" <rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu> writes:
> I just updated my machine to Solaris 9, and am seeing the same
> failures, using expect-5.38.0.  I may try updating my expect
> installation later, just to be sure.  A expect script that just has a
> tight loop spawning echo and expecting on its output reveals similar
> behavior, so it's either an expect bug or a Solaris 9 kernel bug.

It appears there's a 5.39.0 release out a couple months now, though
the history file doesn't indicate that anything's been fixed on
Solaris.  I'll give it a try anyways.

Could you send (or attach in RT) the test script?  If we can't figure
this out here, we should report it to Don Libes and see if he knows
anything.

Ken