Received: from citi.umich.edu (citi.umich.edu [141.211.133.111]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3p2) with ESMTP id RAA03813; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:08:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from citi.umich.edu (rock.citi.umich.edu [141.211.133.90]) by citi.umich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB7720829 for <rt@krbdev.mit.edu>; Mon,  5 Jan 2004 17:08:00 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4
To: rt@krbdev.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #2058] V4 lifetime 
In-Reply-To: Message from "Sam Hartman via RT" <rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu>  of "Mon, 05 Jan 2004 16:41:49 EST." <rt-2058-9042.17.3207649540105@krbdev.mit.edu> 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 17:07:57 -0500
From: Kevin Coffman <kwc@citi.umich.edu>
Message-Id: <20040105220800.3DB7720829@citi.umich.edu>
RT-Send-Cc: 
X-RT-Original-Encoding: us-ascii
Content-Length: 268

> It's my understanding that the only problem here with the MIT codebase
> is that backdating the request too far will cause the client library
> clockskew check to fail.  The other problem seems to be specific to
> the Umich patches.

That's correct.  Thanks!

K.C.