Received: from konishi-polis.mit.edu (HOTASS-9.MIT.EDU [18.101.1.46]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3p2) with ESMTP id QAA11260; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:00:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: by konishi-polis.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id E76971515EA; Tue,  6 Jan 2004 16:00:09 -0500 (EST)
To: rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #2106] bug in krb5_cc_remove_cred API?
References: <rt-2106-9066.0.663048942408508@krbdev.mit.edu>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 16:00:09 -0500
In-Reply-To: <rt-2106-9066.0.663048942408508@krbdev.mit.edu> (Jeffrey Altman via's message of "Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:21:53 -0500 (EST)")
Message-Id: <tslllokdc86.fsf@konishi-polis.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
RT-Send-Cc: 
X-RT-Original-Encoding: us-ascii
Content-Length: 432

>>>>> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Altman via RT <rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu> writes:

    Jeffrey> My preference is to add functions to each of the
    Jeffrey> implementations.  The hardest question to answer is which
    Jeffrey> error should be returned.  I do not believe any of the
    Jeffrey> existing error values is appropriate and a new error:
    Jeffrey> KRB5_CC_NOSUPP should be added.

But I don't object to either proposal.