Received: from konishi-polis.mit.edu (KONISHI-POLIS.MIT.EDU [18.18.3.10]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3p2) with ESMTP id PAA01151; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:22:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by konishi-polis.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id C320315159C; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:22:45 -0400 (EDT)
To: rt@krbdev.mit.edu
Cc: krb5-prs@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #2536] Krb5 Admin Guide fails to document krb524
References: <rt-2536-10835.5.46642668060443@krbdev.mit.edu>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:22:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <rt-2536-10835.5.46642668060443@krbdev.mit.edu> (Jeffrey Altman's message of "Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:48:38 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-Id: <tsl8ygv683e.fsf@konishi-polis.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
RT-Send-Cc: 
X-RT-Original-Encoding: us-ascii
Content-Length: 487

>>>>> "\"\"Jeffrey" == \"\"Jeffrey Altman [Kermit Project]\" via RT\" <Jeffrey> writes:


    \"\"Jeffrey> The fact that the default port of 4444 is now being
    \"\"Jeffrey> blocked by ISP's and therefore an alternate port
    \"\"Jeffrey> should be used needs to be added.

I disagree with this.  Adding a warning about the default port and
firewalls seems reasonable, but it's sufficiently widely deployed that
recommending people change their krb524 p,orts is probably ill advised.