Received: from biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (BISCAYNE-ONE-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.80]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3p2) with ESMTP id RAA24518; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:50:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id j1OMoTIK014644; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:50:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from [18.18.1.76] (KEN-WIRELESS.MIT.EDU [18.18.1.76]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as raeburn@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id j1OMoM0a024977 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:50:23 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ken Raeburn Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #2941] krb5-1.4 is unbuildable on HPUX 10.20 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:50:21 -0500 To: rt@krbdev.mit.edu X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Spam-Score: -0.001 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Scanned-BY: MIMEDefang 2.42 RT-Send-Cc: X-RT-Original-Encoding: us-ascii Content-Length: 588 On Feb 24, 2005, at 17:46, Lenny Foner via RT wrote: > I just noticed that jaltman and DEEngert have added comments to the > ticket but didn't send mail (hence I didn't see them until I thought > to check the ticket itself). Those who are seeing only mail and not > the ticket might want to take a look. Yeah, unfortunately the default reply-to address is the "file a comment and send mail to subscribers of the bug list but not to the person who reported the bug" address. I've been editing the headers in my replies to use the "including the reporter of the bug" address... Ken