Received: from biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (BISCAYNE-ONE-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.80]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3p2) with ESMTP id TAA29435; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 19:46:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id k55Nk1UA006020; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 19:46:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [18.18.1.160] (NOME-KING.MIT.EDU [18.18.1.160]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as raeburn@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id k55Njs5Y008666 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 19:45:54 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <rt-3821-16734.19.757874300512@krbdev.mit.edu>
References: <rt-3821-16734.19.757874300512@krbdev.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <B491BC44-D615-4302-9BAE-E1A066D1DF6F@mit.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #3821] krb5-1.5 alpha - should library version numbers be bumped? 
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 19:46:09 -0400
To: MIT Kerberos RT <rt@krbdev.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750)
X-Spam-Score: 1.217
X-Spam-Level: * (1.217)
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Scanned-BY: MIMEDefang 2.42
RT-Send-Cc: 
X-RT-Original-Encoding: us-ascii
Content-Length: 325

On Jun 5, 2006, at 19:42, Ezra Peisach via RT wrote:
> I am looking at a redhat system - looks like it is 1.3.4 - so maybe  
> this
> is not an issue..

Well, it still wasn't supposed to change ... when you look at the  
symbols actually declared in the headers.  (Minus those inside the  
"KRB5_PRIVATE" blocks, etc.)

Ken