Received: from serrano.cc.columbia.edu (IDENT:cu41754@serrano.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.6]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3p2) with ESMTP id SAA14796; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:09:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.13] (cpe-68-175-91-105.nyc.res.rr.com [68.175.91.105]) (user=jaltman mech=PLAIN bits=0) by serrano.cc.columbia.edu (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6QM9W9O005083 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:09:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <44C7E871.6090706@mit.edu> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:10:57 -0400 From: Jeffrey Altman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rt-kfw@krbdev.mit.edu Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #3401] Possible bug in NetIDMgr References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-No-Spam-Score: Local X-Scanned-BY: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 128.59.29.6 RT-Send-Cc: X-RT-Original-Encoding: iso-8859-1 Content-Length: 1200 You should have received an e-mail yesterday in response to this ticket pointing you at the release of KFW 3.1 Beta 1. See http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/ Jeffrey Altman rlcarlson@anl.gov via RT wrote: > Now that it is 4 months later, I was wondering if any progress had been > made. > Any information appreciated. > Ray Carlson > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ray Carlson [mailto:rlcarlson@anl.gov] > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 10:55 AM > To: rt-kfw@krbdev.mit.edu > Cc: rlcarlson@anl.gov > Subject: RE: [krbdev.mit.edu #3401] Possible bug in NetIDMgr > > Thanks for the information. We don't have a deadline because we will just > stay with the old version, 2.6.5, until you get a version that works with > numbers in the ID. > > Ray Carlson > > -----Original Message----- > From: 0000-Admin [mailto:daemon@MIT.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Altman via RT > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 10:41 AM > To: rlcarlson@anl.gov > Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #3401] Possible bug in NetIDMgr > > > Due to lack of resources, the KFW release has been delayed > until other projects are completed. If you have a deadline > by which you require functionality of KFW 3.x, please let > us know. >