Received: from carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3p2) with ESMTP id AAA16136; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 00:23:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 5D2EAE0127; Wed,  6 Sep 2006 00:23:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
To: rt@krbdev.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #4237] SVN Commit
References: <rt-4237-18531.19.0755783867305@krbdev.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:23:15 -0400
In-Reply-To: <rt-4237-18531.19.0755783867305@krbdev.mit.edu> (Jeffrey Altman via's message of "Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:47:37 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-Id: <tslmz9dy66k.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
RT-Send-Cc: 
X-RT-Original-Encoding: us-ascii
Content-Length: 700

>>>>> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Altman via RT <rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu> writes:

    Jeffrey> 	ktbase.c, ccbase.c: When a file path is specified
    Jeffrey> without the prefix we must infer the use of the "FILE"
    Jeffrey> prefix.  However, we were setting the prefix including
    Jeffrey> the colon separator when the separator should have been
    Jeffrey> ignored.


So, for cache names like c:/foo/bar, I completely agree we should
interpret them as files.

If it is a completely unqualified name, like foobar_baz, then it is
important that KFW and KFM do the same thing.  It's also important
that if you change either the KFW or KFM behavior you discuss with
Jeff or Alexis to confirm.

--Sam