Received: from jalapeno.cc.columbia.edu (IDENT:cu41754@jalapeno.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.5]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3p2) with ESMTP id NAA28278; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:50:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.13] (cpe-68-175-91-105.nyc.res.rr.com [68.175.91.105]) (user=jaltman mech=PLAIN bits=0) by jalapeno.cc.columbia.edu (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8LHoIY9007251 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:50:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <4512D172.4090808@mit.edu> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:52:50 -0400 From: Jeffrey Altman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rt@krbdev.mit.edu Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #4310] NSIS installer - update for Win2K NetIDMgr References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-No-Spam-Score: Local X-Scanned-BY: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 128.59.29.5 RT-Send-Cc: X-RT-Original-Encoding: iso-8859-1 Content-Length: 780 Sam Hartman via RT wrote: >>>>>> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Altman via RT writes: > > Jeffrey> Please pullup to 1-4 and 1-5 branches > Jeffrey> _______________________________________________ krb5-bugs > > Do you actually plan to have a 1.5-based KFW release before we branch > 1.6? I'd assume a branch of 1.6 in October. As we discussed privately, it is my hope to have a KFW 3.2 with 64-bit finished before Thanksgiving. Doing so requires a beta series to be packaged before then. If 1.6 is ready and stable before 3.2 is out of beta then we can shift to that. In the meantime, I want to keep the src/windows directory tree synchronized across 1-4 and 1-5 branches until we are no longer issuing releases off of the lowest numbered branch.