From ptracy@nwu.edu Mon Oct 21 17:39:49 1996
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28]) by rt-11.MIT.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA08134 for <bugs@RT-11.MIT.EDU>; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 17:39:49 -0400
Received: from grumpy.nsg.nwu.edu by MIT.EDU with SMTP
id AA04039; Mon, 21 Oct 96 17:39:46 EDT
Received: from aquarius (aquarius.acns.nwu.edu [129.105.110.169]) by grumpy.nsg.nwu.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3/25.0) with SMTP id QAA12867 for <krb5-bugs@athena.mit.edu>; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 16:43:08 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <2.2.32.19961021213940.00908ea8@grumpy.nsg.nwu.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 16:39:40 -0500
From: Phil Tracy <ptracy@nwu.edu>
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: interest in NT version of K5
State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: tytso
State-Changed-When: Wed Oct 23 00:19:10 1996
State-Changed-Why: Not a bug, request for info.
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU, Phil Tracy <ptracy@nwu.edu>
Cc: gnats-admin@RT-11.MIT.EDU, krb5-prs@RT-11.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: pending/126: interest in NT version of K5
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 00:21:35 -0400
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 16:39:40 -0500
From: Phil Tracy <ptracy@nwu.edu>
At any rate, I have an existing K4 application for which I'm trying to port
the server portion to NT without much success, as John Miller's port appears
to be incomplete as far as the libraries go. At this point, I'm willing to
consider converting the application (client portion as well) to K5 instead
of finishing the K4 NT port, assuming the K5 NT version will be more
advanced than what I have with K4.
Any info on the NT version of K5 is appreciated. I'm willing to try out
beta stuff, but I'm not sure how useful that will be unless I have time to
port the client half of my application to K5 also. Thanks.
The NT code hasn't been folded into our main sources yet, so it's not
quite ready for me to release yet. When it is ready (which will
hopefully be within a week or so --- the person doing the merged has
promised to get to it soon), I'll be able send you our a pre-release
snapshot. I'll put you on the list of people who should be notified
when it is ready.
- Ted
interested in the NT version of Kerberos. I am interested, but I don't have
an address for Ted, so sorry if this goes to the wrong person.
At any rate, I have an existing K4 application for which I'm trying to port
the server portion to NT without much success, as John Miller's port appears
to be incomplete as far as the libraries go. At this point, I'm willing to
consider converting the application (client portion as well) to K5 instead
of finishing the K4 NT port, assuming the K5 NT version will be more
advanced than what I have with K4.
Any info on the NT version of K5 is appreciated. I'm willing to try out
beta stuff, but I'm not sure how useful that will be unless I have time to
port the client half of my application to K5 also. Thanks.
- Phil
--
Phillip Tracy <ptracy@nwu.edu>
Northwestern University ACNS, Evanston, IL USA
http://grumpy.nsg.nwu.edu/tracy/philtracy.html
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28]) by rt-11.MIT.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA08134 for <bugs@RT-11.MIT.EDU>; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 17:39:49 -0400
Received: from grumpy.nsg.nwu.edu by MIT.EDU with SMTP
id AA04039; Mon, 21 Oct 96 17:39:46 EDT
Received: from aquarius (aquarius.acns.nwu.edu [129.105.110.169]) by grumpy.nsg.nwu.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3/25.0) with SMTP id QAA12867 for <krb5-bugs@athena.mit.edu>; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 16:43:08 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <2.2.32.19961021213940.00908ea8@grumpy.nsg.nwu.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 16:39:40 -0500
From: Phil Tracy <ptracy@nwu.edu>
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: interest in NT version of K5
Show quoted text
>Number: 126
>Category: pending
>Synopsis: interest in NT version of K5
>Confidential: yes
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: gnats-admin
>State: closed
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: unknown
>Arrival-Date: Mon Oct e 17:40:00 EDT 1996
>Last-Modified: Wed Oct e 00:22:00 EDT 1996
>Originator:
>Organization:
>Release:
>Environment:
>Description:
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Audit-Trail:
>Category: pending
>Synopsis: interest in NT version of K5
>Confidential: yes
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: gnats-admin
>State: closed
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: unknown
>Arrival-Date: Mon Oct e 17:40:00 EDT 1996
>Last-Modified: Wed Oct e 00:22:00 EDT 1996
>Originator:
>Organization:
>Release:
>Environment:
>Description:
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: tytso
State-Changed-When: Wed Oct 23 00:19:10 1996
State-Changed-Why: Not a bug, request for info.
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU, Phil Tracy <ptracy@nwu.edu>
Cc: gnats-admin@RT-11.MIT.EDU, krb5-prs@RT-11.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: pending/126: interest in NT version of K5
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 00:21:35 -0400
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 16:39:40 -0500
From: Phil Tracy <ptracy@nwu.edu>
At any rate, I have an existing K4 application for which I'm trying to port
the server portion to NT without much success, as John Miller's port appears
to be incomplete as far as the libraries go. At this point, I'm willing to
consider converting the application (client portion as well) to K5 instead
of finishing the K4 NT port, assuming the K5 NT version will be more
advanced than what I have with K4.
Any info on the NT version of K5 is appreciated. I'm willing to try out
beta stuff, but I'm not sure how useful that will be unless I have time to
port the client half of my application to K5 also. Thanks.
The NT code hasn't been folded into our main sources yet, so it's not
quite ready for me to release yet. When it is ready (which will
hopefully be within a week or so --- the person doing the merged has
promised to get to it soon), I'll be able send you our a pre-release
snapshot. I'll put you on the list of people who should be notified
when it is ready.
- Ted
Show quoted text
>Unformatted:
I saw a reference in the announcement indicating I should contact "Ted" ifinterested in the NT version of Kerberos. I am interested, but I don't have
an address for Ted, so sorry if this goes to the wrong person.
At any rate, I have an existing K4 application for which I'm trying to port
the server portion to NT without much success, as John Miller's port appears
to be incomplete as far as the libraries go. At this point, I'm willing to
consider converting the application (client portion as well) to K5 instead
of finishing the K4 NT port, assuming the K5 NT version will be more
advanced than what I have with K4.
Any info on the NT version of K5 is appreciated. I'm willing to try out
beta stuff, but I'm not sure how useful that will be unless I have time to
port the client half of my application to K5 also. Thanks.
- Phil
--
Phillip Tracy <ptracy@nwu.edu>
Northwestern University ACNS, Evanston, IL USA
http://grumpy.nsg.nwu.edu/tracy/philtracy.html