From bjaspan@MIT.EDU Thu Nov 7 15:17:17 1996
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.72.1.2]) by rt-11.MIT.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA26635 for <bugs@RT-11.MIT.EDU>; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 15:17:16 -0500
Received: from DUN-DUN-NOODLES.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
id AA17009; Thu, 7 Nov 96 15:17:16 EST
Received: by DUN-DUN-NOODLES.MIT.EDU (5.x/4.7) id AA14351; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 15:17:13 -0500
Message-Id: <9611072017.AA14351@DUN-DUN-NOODLES.MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 15:17:13 -0500
From: bjaspan@MIT.EDU
Reply-To: bjaspan@MIT.EDU
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: old bugs in krb5-bugs in discuss meeting
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.99
System: SunOS DUN-DUN-NOODLES 5.4 Generic_101945-37 sun4m sparc
I just discovered at least two bugs that were logged in the krb5-bugs
discuss meeting that were not re-logged into GNATS. At our recent bug
tracking meeting, we only considered bugs already in GNATS, so I
suspect all previous bugs are being ignored.
This is bad. We should migrate all old bugs from the discuss meeting
into GNATS, before the 1.0 release.
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU, bjaspan@MIT.EDU
Cc: krb5-unassigned@RT-11.MIT.EDU, gnats-admin@RT-11.MIT.EDU,
krb5-prs@RT-11.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: krb5-misc/165: old bugs in krb5-bugs in discuss meeting
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 18:53:46 -0500
There are some 700-800 unclosed bugs in the old krb5-bugs discuss
meeting. Figuring out which ones still apply is going to be a major
job; a lot of them are moot.
- Ted
From: "Barry Jaspan" <bjaspan@MIT.EDU>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU, bjaspan@MIT.EDU, krb5-unassigned@RT-11.MIT.EDU,
gnats-admin@RT-11.MIT.EDU, krb5-prs@RT-11.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: krb5-misc/165: old bugs in krb5-bugs in discuss meeting
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 13:10:08 -0500
In that case, perhaps the task list for krb5 1.1 should be nothing
other than reviewing all the existing known bugs, deciding which ones
are high priority, and fixing as many as possible in a reasonable
release timeframe.
Seriously, given that we have the bug reports, and now we have a
decent means of tracking the bug reports, we should "clean up our
act."
Barry
State-Changed-From-To: open-analyzed
State-Changed-By: tlyu
State-Changed-When: Mon Jul 7 21:16:33 1997
State-Changed-Why:
Downgrading this a little; I've already done some work on this and am
punting on the remainder while we clean up the rest of the bug
database.
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed-closed
State-Changed-By: hartmans
State-Changed-When: Wed Apr 10 16:08:06 2002
State-Changed-Why:
queue evil laughter.
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.72.1.2]) by rt-11.MIT.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA26635 for <bugs@RT-11.MIT.EDU>; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 15:17:16 -0500
Received: from DUN-DUN-NOODLES.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
id AA17009; Thu, 7 Nov 96 15:17:16 EST
Received: by DUN-DUN-NOODLES.MIT.EDU (5.x/4.7) id AA14351; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 15:17:13 -0500
Message-Id: <9611072017.AA14351@DUN-DUN-NOODLES.MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 15:17:13 -0500
From: bjaspan@MIT.EDU
Reply-To: bjaspan@MIT.EDU
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: old bugs in krb5-bugs in discuss meeting
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.99
Show quoted text
>Number: 165
>Category: krb5-misc
>Synopsis: old bugs in krb5-bugs in discuss meeting
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: low
>Responsible: krb5-unassigned
>State: closed
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: unknown
>Arrival-Date: Thu Nov 07 15:18:01 EST 1996
>Last-Modified: Wed Apr 10 16:08:13 EDT 2002
>Originator: Barry Jaspan
>Organization:
mit>Category: krb5-misc
>Synopsis: old bugs in krb5-bugs in discuss meeting
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: low
>Responsible: krb5-unassigned
>State: closed
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: unknown
>Arrival-Date: Thu Nov 07 15:18:01 EST 1996
>Last-Modified: Wed Apr 10 16:08:13 EDT 2002
>Originator: Barry Jaspan
>Organization:
Show quoted text
>Release: 1.0-development
>Environment:
>Environment:
System: SunOS DUN-DUN-NOODLES 5.4 Generic_101945-37 sun4m sparc
Show quoted text
>Description:
I just discovered at least two bugs that were logged in the krb5-bugs
discuss meeting that were not re-logged into GNATS. At our recent bug
tracking meeting, we only considered bugs already in GNATS, so I
suspect all previous bugs are being ignored.
This is bad. We should migrate all old bugs from the discuss meeting
into GNATS, before the 1.0 release.
Show quoted text
>How-To-Repeat:
Show quoted text
>Fix:
Show quoted text
>Audit-Trail:
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU, bjaspan@MIT.EDU
Cc: krb5-unassigned@RT-11.MIT.EDU, gnats-admin@RT-11.MIT.EDU,
krb5-prs@RT-11.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: krb5-misc/165: old bugs in krb5-bugs in discuss meeting
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 18:53:46 -0500
There are some 700-800 unclosed bugs in the old krb5-bugs discuss
meeting. Figuring out which ones still apply is going to be a major
job; a lot of them are moot.
- Ted
From: "Barry Jaspan" <bjaspan@MIT.EDU>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU, bjaspan@MIT.EDU, krb5-unassigned@RT-11.MIT.EDU,
gnats-admin@RT-11.MIT.EDU, krb5-prs@RT-11.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: krb5-misc/165: old bugs in krb5-bugs in discuss meeting
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 13:10:08 -0500
In that case, perhaps the task list for krb5 1.1 should be nothing
other than reviewing all the existing known bugs, deciding which ones
are high priority, and fixing as many as possible in a reasonable
release timeframe.
Seriously, given that we have the bug reports, and now we have a
decent means of tracking the bug reports, we should "clean up our
act."
Barry
State-Changed-From-To: open-analyzed
State-Changed-By: tlyu
State-Changed-When: Mon Jul 7 21:16:33 1997
State-Changed-Why:
Downgrading this a little; I've already done some work on this and am
punting on the remainder while we clean up the rest of the bug
database.
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed-closed
State-Changed-By: hartmans
State-Changed-When: Wed Apr 10 16:08:06 2002
State-Changed-Why:
queue evil laughter.
Show quoted text
>Unformatted: