From hartmans@MIT.EDU Mon Nov 11 15:38:24 1996
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.72.1.2]) by rt-11.MIT.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA21887 for <bugs@RT-11.MIT.EDU>; Mon, 11 Nov 1996 15:38:23 -0500
Received: from BILL-THE-CAT.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
id AA09782; Mon, 11 Nov 96 15:38:22 EST
Received: by bill-the-cat.MIT.EDU (5.x/4.7) id AA04527; Mon, 11 Nov 1996 15:38:20 -0500
Message-Id: <9611112038.AA04527@bill-the-cat.MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 15:38:20 -0500
From: hartmans@MIT.EDU
Reply-To: hartmans@MIT.EDU
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Cc: jhawk@MIT.EDU
Subject: docs refer to inappropriate domains and IPs for examples
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.99
System: SunOS bill-the-cat 5.4 Generic_101945-37 sun4m sparc
The example IP address in definitions.texinfo was 18.72.0.44
(maple.mit.edu). I don't think we really want to be giving the idea
that people should use our SAP servers as example targets.
Also, the example alternate domain is fubar.org. Unfortunately,
fubar.org is assigned to someone, and I doubt we asked for permission.
I think there were other problems in definitions.tex; one of
the sample IPs looked like a multicast address, etc.
I changed 18.72.0.44 to 10.0.0.6 as a stopgap until someone
who actually knows what the recommended solution for example domains
and IPs looks at the document. (I'm cc:ing jhawk because I believe he
had a good answer to this type of problem the last time someone asked
him.)
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.72.1.2]) by rt-11.MIT.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA21887 for <bugs@RT-11.MIT.EDU>; Mon, 11 Nov 1996 15:38:23 -0500
Received: from BILL-THE-CAT.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
id AA09782; Mon, 11 Nov 96 15:38:22 EST
Received: by bill-the-cat.MIT.EDU (5.x/4.7) id AA04527; Mon, 11 Nov 1996 15:38:20 -0500
Message-Id: <9611112038.AA04527@bill-the-cat.MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 15:38:20 -0500
From: hartmans@MIT.EDU
Reply-To: hartmans@MIT.EDU
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Cc: jhawk@MIT.EDU
Subject: docs refer to inappropriate domains and IPs for examples
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.99
Show quoted text
>Number: 175
>Category: krb5-doc
>Synopsis: docs refer to inappropriate domains and IPs for examples
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: krb5-unassigned
>State: open
>Class: doc-bug
>Submitter-Id: unknown
>Arrival-Date: Mon Nov 11 15:39:00 EST 1996
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Sam Hartman
>Organization:
mit>Category: krb5-doc
>Synopsis: docs refer to inappropriate domains and IPs for examples
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: krb5-unassigned
>State: open
>Class: doc-bug
>Submitter-Id: unknown
>Arrival-Date: Mon Nov 11 15:39:00 EST 1996
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Sam Hartman
>Organization:
Show quoted text
>Release: 1.0-development
>Environment:
>Environment:
System: SunOS bill-the-cat 5.4 Generic_101945-37 sun4m sparc
Show quoted text
>Description:
The example IP address in definitions.texinfo was 18.72.0.44
(maple.mit.edu). I don't think we really want to be giving the idea
that people should use our SAP servers as example targets.
Also, the example alternate domain is fubar.org. Unfortunately,
fubar.org is assigned to someone, and I doubt we asked for permission.
I think there were other problems in definitions.tex; one of
the sample IPs looked like a multicast address, etc.
Show quoted text
>How-To-Repeat:
Show quoted text
>Fix:
I changed 18.72.0.44 to 10.0.0.6 as a stopgap until someone
who actually knows what the recommended solution for example domains
and IPs looks at the document. (I'm cc:ing jhawk because I believe he
had a good answer to this type of problem the last time someone asked
him.)
Show quoted text
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
We need to be careful what example address we use.>Unformatted: