Skip Menu |

Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 4.6KiB
From hartmans@MIT.EDU Thu Nov 21 18:42:29 1996
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU []) by rt-11.MIT.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA06080 for <bugs@RT-11.MIT.EDU>; Thu, 21 Nov 1996 18:42:29 -0500
Received: from PORTNOY.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
id AA27892; Thu, 21 Nov 96 18:42:28 EST
Received: by portnoy.MIT.EDU (5.x/4.7) id AA21995; Thu, 21 Nov 1996 18:42:27 -0500
Message-Id: <9611212342.AA21995@portnoy.MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 18:42:27 -0500
From: hartmans@MIT.EDU
Reply-To: hartmans@MIT.EDU
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: update README file
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.99

Show quoted text
>Number: 219
>Category: krb5-misc
>Synopsis: update README file
>Confidential: no
>Severity: critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: tlyu
>State: closed
>Class: doc-bug
>Submitter-Id: unknown
>Arrival-Date: Thu Nov 21 18:43:01 EST 1996
>Last-Modified: Sun Dec 22 22:58:46 EST 1996
>Originator: Sam Hartman
Show quoted text
>Release: 1.0-development

System: SunOS portnoy 5.4 Generic_101945-37 sun4m sparc

Show quoted text
It's Marc Horowitz not Mark.
Also, it's to not ot.

Show quoted text

Show quoted text

Fix them.
Show quoted text

Responsible-Changed-From-To: krb5-unassigned->tlyu
Responsible-Changed-By: tlyu
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Nov 23 17:14:58 1996
I'm dealing... also adding stuff for the 1.0 release.

From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>
To: krbcore@MIT.EDU, krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Cc: Subject: krb5-doc/219: README changed but one thing missing
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 18:19:12 -0500

I updated README. The only thing I didn't change that should
happen is that the comment about sending bugs to krb5-bugs should
indicate uses should use krb5-send-pr if they got it to install.


State-Changed-From-To: open-analyzed
State-Changed-By: tlyu
State-Changed-When: Mon Nov 25 19:23:46 1996
partially finished.

The item regarding gssrpc symbol collisions may want to get moved to
the incompatibilities section of the build.texinfo, though.

Ted mentioned that maybe we should list all the operating systems that
are known to have incompatibilities in the README and list references
to the texinfo file.

From: "Barry Jaspan" <bjaspan@MIT.EDU>
To: hartmans@MIT.EDU
Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: krb5-misc/219: update README file
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 22:28:42 GMT

The README file should contain information on how to verify the PGP
signature on the source and binary distributions. Also, someone
should verify that it works, as I am getting an odd message. I
created the signature with pgp -sab krb5-1.0.mips-sgi-irix5.3.tar.gz.
When I try to verify it, I get

Show quoted text
>> % pgp krb5-1.0.mips-sgi-irix5.3.tar.gz
>> Pretty Good Privacy(tm) 2.6.2 - Public-key encryption for the masses.
>> (c) 1990-1994 Philip Zimmermann, Phil's Pretty Good Software. 11 Oct 94
>> Uses the RSAREF(tm) Toolkit, which is copyright RSA Data Security, Inc.
>> Distributed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
>> Export of this software may be restricted by the U.S. government.
>> Current time: 1996/11/26 22:28 GMT
>> File has signature. Public key is required to check signature.
>> File 'krb5-1.0.m.$00' has signature, but with no text.
>> Please enter filename of material that signature applies to: krb5-1.0.mips-sgi-irix5.3.tar.gz
>> .
>> Good signature from user "Barry Jaspan <>".
>> Signature made 1996/11/26 22:19 GMT
>> Signature and text are separate. No output file produced.

First, note that i had to re-enter the file name to be verified, even
though the file and .asc signature are in the same directory. Second,
what is "krb5-1.0.m.$00"?

From: Tom Yu <tlyu@MIT.EDU>
To: hartmans@MIT.EDU
Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU, krbdev@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: krb5-misc/219: update README file
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 1996 17:41:25 -0500

Argh. I just noticed that the README now says

* kshd has been modified to accept krb4 encrypted rcp connections; for
this to work, the v4rcp program must be in the sbin directory.

This is wrong; the v4rcp program is searched for in KPROGDIR, which is

Does this merit a partial thaw? Since it only affects the README
file, the binary tarballs shouldn't need to be changed...


State-Changed-From-To: analyzed-feedback
State-Changed-By: tlyu
State-Changed-When: Tue Dec 3 16:12:42 1996

I've change the reference to v4rcp to indicate that it's actually
installed in bin, not sbin. We may want to close this out now.

README revision:

State-Changed-From-To: feedback-closed
State-Changed-By: tlyu
State-Changed-When: Sun Dec 22 22:58:37 1996

Cleaning up.

Show quoted text