From bjaspan@MIT.EDU Tue Nov 26 14:18:43 1996
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28]) by rt-11.MIT.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA17393 for <bugs@RT-11.MIT.EDU>; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 14:18:42 -0500
Received: from THE-TICK.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
id AA10915; Tue, 26 Nov 96 14:18:38 EST
Received: by the-tick.MIT.EDU (940816.SGI.8.6.9/4.7) id TAA24613; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 19:18:30 GMT
Message-Id: <199611261918.TAA24613@the-tick.MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 19:18:30 GMT
From: bjaspan@MIT.EDU
Reply-To: bjaspan@MIT.EDU
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: krb5 vs. krb5-1.0 in build docs
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.99
System: IRIX the-tick 5.3 02091401 IP22 mips
The installation manual describes krb5 instead of krb5-1.0 as the
directory into which the tar files get extracted.
From: "Barry Jaspan" <bjaspan@MIT.EDU>
To: bjaspan@MIT.EDU
Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: krb5-doc/243: krb5 vs. krb5-1.0 in build docs
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 22:03:06 GMT
Also, in the section Create the Database, the paths
/usr/krb5/sbin/kdb5_util and /usr/krb5/var/krb5kdc appear. Basically,
every path in the docs needs to be checked, if we care that they are
right.
From: Tom Yu <tlyu@MIT.EDU>
To: bjaspan@MIT.EDU
Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: krb5-doc/243: krb5 vs. krb5-1.0 in build docs
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 22:39:30 -0500
I've fixed the instances of /usr/krb5/foo by frobbing
definitions.texinfo. I'll deal with the rest in a bit.
---Tom
Responsible-Changed-From-To: krb5-unassigned->tlyu
Responsible-Changed-By: tlyu
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Nov 30 17:44:05 1996
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I've been dealing
State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback
State-Changed-By: tlyu
State-Changed-When: Sat Nov 30 17:44:17 1996
State-Changed-Why:
I think I've hit all the places where it's a problem. Someone else
should cross-check.
From: "Barry Jaspan" <bjaspan@MIT.EDU>
To: bjaspan@MIT.EDU
Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: krb5-doc/243: krb5 vs. krb5-1.0 in build docs
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 17:38:32 GMT
I made a quick scan, and it looks fine to me.
Barry
State-Changed-From-To: feedback-closed
State-Changed-By: tlyu
State-Changed-When: Sun Dec 22 23:01:33 1996
State-Changed-Why:
Cleaning up.
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28]) by rt-11.MIT.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA17393 for <bugs@RT-11.MIT.EDU>; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 14:18:42 -0500
Received: from THE-TICK.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
id AA10915; Tue, 26 Nov 96 14:18:38 EST
Received: by the-tick.MIT.EDU (940816.SGI.8.6.9/4.7) id TAA24613; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 19:18:30 GMT
Message-Id: <199611261918.TAA24613@the-tick.MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 19:18:30 GMT
From: bjaspan@MIT.EDU
Reply-To: bjaspan@MIT.EDU
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: krb5 vs. krb5-1.0 in build docs
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.99
Show quoted text
>Number: 243
>Category: krb5-doc
>Synopsis: krb5 vs. krb5-1.0 in build docs
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: tlyu
>State: closed
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: unknown
>Arrival-Date: Tue Nov 26 14:19:01 EST 1996
>Last-Modified: Sun Dec 22 23:01:39 EST 1996
>Originator: Barry Jaspan
>Organization:
mit>Category: krb5-doc
>Synopsis: krb5 vs. krb5-1.0 in build docs
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: tlyu
>State: closed
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: unknown
>Arrival-Date: Tue Nov 26 14:19:01 EST 1996
>Last-Modified: Sun Dec 22 23:01:39 EST 1996
>Originator: Barry Jaspan
>Organization:
Show quoted text
>Release: 1.0-development
>Environment:
>Environment:
System: IRIX the-tick 5.3 02091401 IP22 mips
Show quoted text
>Description:
The installation manual describes krb5 instead of krb5-1.0 as the
directory into which the tar files get extracted.
Show quoted text
>How-To-Repeat:
Show quoted text
>Fix:
Show quoted text
>Audit-Trail:
From: "Barry Jaspan" <bjaspan@MIT.EDU>
To: bjaspan@MIT.EDU
Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: krb5-doc/243: krb5 vs. krb5-1.0 in build docs
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 22:03:06 GMT
Also, in the section Create the Database, the paths
/usr/krb5/sbin/kdb5_util and /usr/krb5/var/krb5kdc appear. Basically,
every path in the docs needs to be checked, if we care that they are
right.
From: Tom Yu <tlyu@MIT.EDU>
To: bjaspan@MIT.EDU
Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: krb5-doc/243: krb5 vs. krb5-1.0 in build docs
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 22:39:30 -0500
I've fixed the instances of /usr/krb5/foo by frobbing
definitions.texinfo. I'll deal with the rest in a bit.
---Tom
Responsible-Changed-From-To: krb5-unassigned->tlyu
Responsible-Changed-By: tlyu
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Nov 30 17:44:05 1996
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I've been dealing
State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback
State-Changed-By: tlyu
State-Changed-When: Sat Nov 30 17:44:17 1996
State-Changed-Why:
I think I've hit all the places where it's a problem. Someone else
should cross-check.
From: "Barry Jaspan" <bjaspan@MIT.EDU>
To: bjaspan@MIT.EDU
Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: krb5-doc/243: krb5 vs. krb5-1.0 in build docs
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 17:38:32 GMT
I made a quick scan, and it looks fine to me.
Barry
State-Changed-From-To: feedback-closed
State-Changed-By: tlyu
State-Changed-When: Sun Dec 22 23:01:33 1996
State-Changed-Why:
Cleaning up.
Show quoted text
>Unformatted: