Skip Menu |
 

Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 1.7KiB
From epeisach@MIT.EDU Tue Nov 26 17:01:49 1996
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.28]) by rt-11.MIT.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA18494 for <bugs@RT-11.MIT.EDU>; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 17:01:48 -0500
Received: from KANGAROO.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
id AA19156; Tue, 26 Nov 96 17:01:34 EST
Received: by kangaroo.mit.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/08Mar96-0212PM)
id AA07413; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 17:01:33 -0500
Message-Id: <9611262201.AA07413@kangaroo.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 17:01:32 EST
From: Ezra Peisach <epeisach@MIT.EDU>
To: bjaspan@MIT.EDU
Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU, krbdev@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 26 Nov 1996 21:55:00 GMT."
<199611262155.VAA21440@the-tick.MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: binary distributions don't contain krb5.conf or kdc.conf

Show quoted text
>Number: 250
>Category: pending
>Synopsis: Re: binary distributions don't contain krb5.conf or kdc.conf
>Confidential: yes
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: gnats-admin
>State: closed
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: unknown
>Arrival-Date: Tue Nov 26 17:02:01 EST 1996
>Last-Modified: Fri Nov 29 19:59:26 EST 1996
>Originator:
>Organization:
>Release:
>Environment:
>Description:
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Audit-Trail:

State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: tlyu
State-Changed-When: Fri Nov 29 19:59:05 1996
State-Changed-Why:
appended to [249]

Show quoted text
>Unformatted:
I really would prefer not having to change the tarball...
Question: Would the sample files be appropriate to install in share/config-files?
Would we be better off providing next to the binary distribution
a tarball containing these shared files? (And indicate that
users should get both - at least for this release).

Ezra