Skip Menu |

Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 1.7KiB
From epeisach@MIT.EDU Tue Nov 26 17:01:49 1996
Received: from MIT.EDU (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU []) by rt-11.MIT.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA18494 for <bugs@RT-11.MIT.EDU>; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 17:01:48 -0500
Received: from KANGAROO.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
id AA19156; Tue, 26 Nov 96 17:01:34 EST
Received: by; (5.65/
id AA07413; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 17:01:33 -0500
Message-Id: <>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 17:01:32 EST
From: Ezra Peisach <epeisach@MIT.EDU>
To: bjaspan@MIT.EDU
Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU, krbdev@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 26 Nov 1996 21:55:00 GMT."
Subject: Re: binary distributions don't contain krb5.conf or kdc.conf

Show quoted text
>Number: 250
>Category: pending
>Synopsis: Re: binary distributions don't contain krb5.conf or kdc.conf
>Confidential: yes
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: gnats-admin
>State: closed
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: unknown
>Arrival-Date: Tue Nov 26 17:02:01 EST 1996
>Last-Modified: Fri Nov 29 19:59:26 EST 1996

State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: tlyu
State-Changed-When: Fri Nov 29 19:59:05 1996
appended to [249]

Show quoted text
I really would prefer not having to change the tarball...
Question: Would the sample files be appropriate to install in share/config-files?
Would we be better off providing next to the binary distribution
a tarball containing these shared files? (And indicate that
users should get both - at least for this release).