From jhawk@bbnplanet.com Mon Dec 2 17:09:35 1996
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.72.1.2]) by rt-11.MIT.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA13363 for <bugs@RT-11.MIT.EDU>; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 17:09:34 -0500
Received: from all-purpose-gunk.near.net by MIT.EDU with SMTP
id AA07020; Mon, 2 Dec 96 17:09:32 EST
Received: (from jhawk@localhost) by all-purpose-gunk.near.net (8.8.3/8.8.3) id RAA23705; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 17:09:23 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199612022209.RAA23705@all-purpose-gunk.near.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 17:09:23 -0500 (EST)
From: John Hawkinson <jhawk@bbnplanet.com>
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: gssftp manpage is lacking "passive" command
System: NetBSD zygorthian-space-raiders 1.2B NetBSD 1.2B (TELEGENIC) #4: Mon Nov 25 05:39:10 EST 1996 mycroft@zygorthian-space-raiders:
/u2/sys-virgin/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/TELEGENIC i386
does not work. At first I assumed that this was because the code was from
4.4lite and the manpage from 4.3reno, but examination of SCCS IDs clarified
that the manpage and code were both from 4.3network2 with some modifications.
If there were no SCCS IDs in the tree tracking this stuff down would have
been harder. This is part of why it unfortunate that krb5 has seen fit to
remove RCS tags from files.
folks seemed to do the right thing...
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>
To: Unassigned Problem Report <krb5-unassigned@RT-11.MIT.EDU>
Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: krb5-appl/270: gssftp manpage is lacking "passive" command
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 05:43:55 -0500
`Sam Hartman' made changes to this PR.
*** /tmp/gnatsa006Bi Tue Dec 10 05:43:31 1996
--- /tmp/gnatsb006Bi Tue Dec 10 05:43:46 1996
***************
*** 10,16 ****
Subject: gssftp manpage is lacking "passive" command
Subject: gssftp manpage is lacking "passive" command
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.72.1.2]) by rt-11.MIT.EDU (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA13363 for <bugs@RT-11.MIT.EDU>; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 17:09:34 -0500
Received: from all-purpose-gunk.near.net by MIT.EDU with SMTP
id AA07020; Mon, 2 Dec 96 17:09:32 EST
Received: (from jhawk@localhost) by all-purpose-gunk.near.net (8.8.3/8.8.3) id RAA23705; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 17:09:23 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199612022209.RAA23705@all-purpose-gunk.near.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 17:09:23 -0500 (EST)
From: John Hawkinson <jhawk@bbnplanet.com>
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: gssftp manpage is lacking "passive" command
Show quoted text
>Number: 270
>Category: krb5-doc
>Synopsis: gssftp manpage is lacking "passive" command
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: krb5-unassigned
>State: open
>Class: doc-bug
>Submitter-Id: unknown
>Arrival-Date: Mon Dec 02 17:10:01 EST 1996
>Last-Modified: Tue Jul 28 05:06:27 EDT 1998
>Originator: John Hawkinson
>Organization:
BBN Planet>Category: krb5-doc
>Synopsis: gssftp manpage is lacking "passive" command
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: krb5-unassigned
>State: open
>Class: doc-bug
>Submitter-Id: unknown
>Arrival-Date: Mon Dec 02 17:10:01 EST 1996
>Last-Modified: Tue Jul 28 05:06:27 EDT 1998
>Originator: John Hawkinson
>Organization:
Show quoted text
>Release: 1.0-development
>Environment:
<machine, os, target, libraries (multiple lines)>>Environment:
System: NetBSD zygorthian-space-raiders 1.2B NetBSD 1.2B (TELEGENIC) #4: Mon Nov 25 05:39:10 EST 1996 mycroft@zygorthian-space-raiders:
/u2/sys-virgin/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/TELEGENIC i386
Show quoted text
>Description:
The gssftp manpage does not document the "passive" command.Show quoted text
>How-To-Repeat:
Try to ftp to pub1.bryant.vix.com and discover that passive mode ftpdoes not work. At first I assumed that this was because the code was from
4.4lite and the manpage from 4.3reno, but examination of SCCS IDs clarified
that the manpage and code were both from 4.3network2 with some modifications.
If there were no SCCS IDs in the tree tracking this stuff down would have
been harder. This is part of why it unfortunate that krb5 has seen fit to
remove RCS tags from files.
Show quoted text
>Fix:
Pummel the authors of the passive patches since the security patchfolks seemed to do the right thing...
Show quoted text
>Audit-Trail:
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>
To: Unassigned Problem Report <krb5-unassigned@RT-11.MIT.EDU>
Cc: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: krb5-appl/270: gssftp manpage is lacking "passive" command
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 05:43:55 -0500
`Sam Hartman' made changes to this PR.
*** /tmp/gnatsa006Bi Tue Dec 10 05:43:31 1996
--- /tmp/gnatsb006Bi Tue Dec 10 05:43:46 1996
***************
*** 10,16 ****
Subject: gssftp manpage is lacking "passive" command
Show quoted text
>Number: 270
! >Category: krb5-clientsShow quoted text
>Synopsis: gssftp manpage is lacking "passive" command
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
--- 10,16 ---->Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
Subject: gssftp manpage is lacking "passive" command
Show quoted text
>Number: 270
! >Category: krb5-applShow quoted text
>Synopsis: gssftp manpage is lacking "passive" command
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Unformatted:
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Unformatted: