From krb5-bugs-incoming-bounces@PCH.mit.edu Mon Jun 26 13:56:33 2006
Received: from pch.mit.edu (PCH.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.90]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3p2) with ESMTP
id NAA19151; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:56:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pch.mit.edu (pch.mit.edu [127.0.0.1])
by pch.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k5QHu2qr017439
for <krb5-send-pr@krbdev.mit.edu>; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:56:02 -0400
Received: from fort-point-station.mit.edu (FORT-POINT-STATION.MIT.EDU
[18.7.7.76])
by pch.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k5QGXPtW002453
for <krb5-bugs-incoming@PCH.mit.edu>; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:33:25 -0400
Received: from fafnir.cs.unc.edu (fafnir.cs.unc.edu [152.2.129.90])
by fort-point-station.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id
k5QGXJA8013339
for <krb5-bugs@mit.edu>; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:33:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (fafnir.cs.unc.edu: domain of sopko@cs.unc.edu is
neutral about designating 152.2.129.13 as permitted sender)
Received: from lark.cs.unc.edu (lark.cs.unc.edu [152.2.129.13])
by fafnir.cs.unc.edu (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5QGXJ3G010714
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <krb5-bugs@mit.edu>; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:33:19 -0400
Received: from lark.cs.unc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by lark.cs.unc.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k5QGXJVq009450
for <krb5-bugs@mit.edu>; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:33:19 -0400
Received: (from sopko@localhost)
by lark.cs.unc.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k5QGXIZj009449;
Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:33:18 -0400
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:33:18 -0400
From: "John W. Sopko" <sopko@cs.unc.edu>
Message-Id: <200606261633.k5QGXIZj009449@lark.cs.unc.edu>
To: krb5-bugs@mit.edu
Subject: domain_realm doc update
X-send-pr-version: 3.99
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 152.2.129.90
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:55:56 -0400
X-BeenThere: krb5-bugs-incoming@mailman.mit.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sopko@cs.unc.edu
Sender: krb5-bugs-incoming-bounces@PCH.mit.edu
Errors-To: krb5-bugs-incoming-bounces@PCH.mit.edu
email: sopko AT cs.unc.edu Computer Science Dept., CB 3175
Phone: 919-962-1844 Sitterson Hall; Room 135
Fax: 919-962-1799 Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
System: Linux lark.cs.unc.edu 2.6.9-34.0.1.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed May 17 17:05:24 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Architecture: i686
http://mit.edu/kerberos/krb5-1.4/krb5-1.4.3/doc/krb5-admin/domain_realm.html#domain_realm
[domain_realm]
.mit.edu = ATHENA.MIT.EDU
mit.edu = ATHENA.MIT.EDU
crash.mit.edu = TEST.ATHENA.MIT.EDU
With:
[domain_realm]
.mit.edu = ATHENA.MIT.EDU
mit.edu = ATHENA.MIT.EDU
crash.mit.edu = TEST.ATHENA.MIT.EDU
.example.com = EXAMPLE.COM
example.org = EXAMPLE.COM
So the text explanation that follows makes more sense.
Received: from pch.mit.edu (PCH.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.90]) by krbdev.mit.edu (8.9.3p2) with ESMTP
id NAA19151; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:56:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pch.mit.edu (pch.mit.edu [127.0.0.1])
by pch.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k5QHu2qr017439
for <krb5-send-pr@krbdev.mit.edu>; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:56:02 -0400
Received: from fort-point-station.mit.edu (FORT-POINT-STATION.MIT.EDU
[18.7.7.76])
by pch.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k5QGXPtW002453
for <krb5-bugs-incoming@PCH.mit.edu>; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:33:25 -0400
Received: from fafnir.cs.unc.edu (fafnir.cs.unc.edu [152.2.129.90])
by fort-point-station.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id
k5QGXJA8013339
for <krb5-bugs@mit.edu>; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:33:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (fafnir.cs.unc.edu: domain of sopko@cs.unc.edu is
neutral about designating 152.2.129.13 as permitted sender)
Received: from lark.cs.unc.edu (lark.cs.unc.edu [152.2.129.13])
by fafnir.cs.unc.edu (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5QGXJ3G010714
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <krb5-bugs@mit.edu>; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:33:19 -0400
Received: from lark.cs.unc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by lark.cs.unc.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k5QGXJVq009450
for <krb5-bugs@mit.edu>; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:33:19 -0400
Received: (from sopko@localhost)
by lark.cs.unc.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k5QGXIZj009449;
Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:33:18 -0400
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:33:18 -0400
From: "John W. Sopko" <sopko@cs.unc.edu>
Message-Id: <200606261633.k5QGXIZj009449@lark.cs.unc.edu>
To: krb5-bugs@mit.edu
Subject: domain_realm doc update
X-send-pr-version: 3.99
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 152.2.129.90
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:55:56 -0400
X-BeenThere: krb5-bugs-incoming@mailman.mit.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sopko@cs.unc.edu
Sender: krb5-bugs-incoming-bounces@PCH.mit.edu
Errors-To: krb5-bugs-incoming-bounces@PCH.mit.edu
Show quoted text
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator: John W. Sopko
>Organization:
John W. Sopko University of North Carolina>Originator: John W. Sopko
>Organization:
email: sopko AT cs.unc.edu Computer Science Dept., CB 3175
Phone: 919-962-1844 Sitterson Hall; Room 135
Fax: 919-962-1799 Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
Show quoted text
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: [domain_realm] documentation update
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: krb5-doc
>Class: doc-bug
>Release: krb5-1.3.4
>Environment:
>Synopsis: [domain_realm] documentation update
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: krb5-doc
>Class: doc-bug
>Release: krb5-1.3.4
>Environment:
System: Linux lark.cs.unc.edu 2.6.9-34.0.1.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed May 17 17:05:24 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Architecture: i686
Show quoted text
>Description:
update config file example Show quoted text
>How-To-Repeat:
update the info at:http://mit.edu/kerberos/krb5-1.4/krb5-1.4.3/doc/krb5-admin/domain_realm.html#domain_realm
Show quoted text
>Fix: Replace:
[domain_realm]
.mit.edu = ATHENA.MIT.EDU
mit.edu = ATHENA.MIT.EDU
crash.mit.edu = TEST.ATHENA.MIT.EDU
With:
[domain_realm]
.mit.edu = ATHENA.MIT.EDU
mit.edu = ATHENA.MIT.EDU
crash.mit.edu = TEST.ATHENA.MIT.EDU
.example.com = EXAMPLE.COM
example.org = EXAMPLE.COM
So the text explanation that follows makes more sense.