Skip Menu |
 

From: jaltman@mit.edu
Subject: SVN Commit
ktbase.c, ccbase.c: When a file path is specified without
the prefix we must infer the use of the "FILE" prefix.
However, we were setting the prefix including the colon
separator when the separator should have been ignored.


Commit By: jaltman



Revision: 18561
Changed Files:
U trunk/src/lib/krb5/ccache/ccbase.c
U trunk/src/lib/krb5/keytab/ktbase.c
please pullup to both 1.4 and 1.5 branches.
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
To: rt@krbdev.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #4237] SVN Commit
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:23:15 -0400
RT-Send-Cc:
Show quoted text
>>>>> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Altman via RT <rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu> writes:

Show quoted text
Jeffrey> ktbase.c, ccbase.c: When a file path is specified
Jeffrey> without the prefix we must infer the use of the "FILE"
Jeffrey> prefix. However, we were setting the prefix including
Jeffrey> the colon separator when the separator should have been
Jeffrey> ignored.


So, for cache names like c:/foo/bar, I completely agree we should
interpret them as files.

If it is a completely unqualified name, like foobar_baz, then it is
important that KFW and KFM do the same thing. It's also important
that if you change either the KFW or KFM behavior you discuss with
Jeff or Alexis to confirm.

--Sam
To: rt@krbdev.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #4237] SVN Commit
From: Tom Yu <tlyu@MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:31:35 -0400
RT-Send-Cc:
Show quoted text
>>>>> "Sam" == Sam Hartman via RT <rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu> writes:

Show quoted text
Sam> If it is a completely unqualified name, like foobar_baz, then it is
Sam> important that KFW and KFM do the same thing. It's also important
Sam> that if you change either the KFW or KFM behavior you discuss with
Sam> Jeff or Alexis to confirm.

Do KfW and KfM currently do the same thing for un-prefixed names? It
looks like they do, but I wanted to make sure.

---Tom
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:46:10 -0400
From: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@mit.edu>
To: rt@krbdev.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #4237] SVN Commit
RT-Send-Cc:
Tom Yu via RT wrote:
Show quoted text
>>>>>> "Sam" == Sam Hartman via RT <rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu> writes:
>
> Sam> If it is a completely unqualified name, like foobar_baz, then it is
> Sam> important that KFW and KFM do the same thing. It's also important
> Sam> that if you change either the KFW or KFM behavior you discuss with
> Sam> Jeff or Alexis to confirm.
>
> Do KfW and KfM currently do the same thing for un-prefixed names? It
> looks like they do, but I wanted to make sure.
>
> ---Tom

The code after the patch does the correct thing for Windows. I might
question whether or not the drive letter test should be performed on
UNIX platforms. I can't imagine it ever succeeding.

Jeffrey Altman
From: tlyu@mit.edu
Subject: SVN Commit
pull up r18561 from trunk

r18561@cathode-dark-space: jaltman | 2006-09-05 14:47:29 -0400
ticket: new
subject: windows ccache and keytab file paths without a prefix

ktbase.c, ccbase.c: When a file path is specified without
the prefix we must infer the use of the "FILE" prefix.
However, we were setting the prefix including the colon
separator when the separator should have been ignored.




Commit By: tlyu



Revision: 18623
Changed Files:
_U branches/krb5-1-5/
U branches/krb5-1-5/src/lib/krb5/ccache/ccbase.c
U branches/krb5-1-5/src/lib/krb5/keytab/ktbase.c
From: tlyu@mit.edu
Subject: SVN Commit
pull up r18561 from trunk

r18561@cathode-dark-space: jaltman | 2006-09-05 14:47:29 -0400
ticket: new
subject: windows ccache and keytab file paths without a prefix

ktbase.c, ccbase.c: When a file path is specified without
the prefix we must infer the use of the "FILE" prefix.
However, we were setting the prefix including the colon
separator when the separator should have been ignored.




Commit By: tlyu



Revision: 18624
Changed Files:
_U branches/krb5-1-4/
U branches/krb5-1-4/src/lib/krb5/ccache/ccbase.c
U branches/krb5-1-4/src/lib/krb5/keytab/ktbase.c