| Date: | Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:03:19 -0500 |
| From: | Joe Klemencic <jklemenc@fnal.gov> |
| Subject: | NIM & Filezilla |
| To: | kfw-bugs@mit.edu |
Show quoted text
-------- FORWARDED MESSAGE --------
I had a problem with the version of kerberos that came with
NetIDManager. It would not work with FileZilla (which uses parts of
PuTTY for SFTP connections). I am currently using Filezilla 2.2.11. I
tried a few options last September (after I attended some computing
sessions on Sept 11, including one on NetIDManager which looked
promising), but in the end I had to give up and revert back to my
current configuration.
--------------------------------------------------
I am having the same problem as May. The last time I tried to use
NetIDManager, last summer, there was a known kerberos conflict with
running FileZilla, which for me is a critical application. I transfer
files daily between my Windows laptop and a linux desktop, so I am using
Kerberos V5 for Windows 32-bit (v2.6.5).
Do you know if this conflict is still there?
I had a problem with the version of kerberos that came with
NetIDManager. It would not work with FileZilla (which uses parts of
PuTTY for SFTP connections). I am currently using Filezilla 2.2.11. I
tried a few options last September (after I attended some computing
sessions on Sept 11, including one on NetIDManager which looked
promising), but in the end I had to give up and revert back to my
current configuration.
--------------------------------------------------
I am having the same problem as May. The last time I tried to use
NetIDManager, last summer, there was a known kerberos conflict with
running FileZilla, which for me is a critical application. I transfer
files daily between my Windows laptop and a linux desktop, so I am using
Kerberos V5 for Windows 32-bit (v2.6.5).
Do you know if this conflict is still there?
Message body not shown because it is not plain text.