Skip Menu |
 

History Show all quoted text — Show full headers
# Thu Oct 01 17:08:19 2009 "W.Michael Petullo" <mike@flyn.org> - Ticket created
From: "W.Michael Petullo" <mike@flyn.org>
Subject: PATCH: Fix symbol collision between krb5 1.7 and uClibc
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:43:04 -0400
To: krb5-bugs@mit.edu
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 153B
I have attached a patch against krb5 1.7 that fixes a symbol collision
between krb5 and uClibc. This allows one to compile krb5 against uClibc.

Mike
Download 001-uclibc-symbol-collision-fix.patch
application/octet-stream 18.5KiB

Message body not shown because it is not plain text.

# Fri Oct 02 13:47:40 2009 tlyu (Taylor Yu) - Correspondence added
To: rt@krbdev.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #6570] PATCH: Fix symbol collision between krb5 1.7 and uClibc
From: Tom Yu <tlyu@MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:47:37 -0400
RT-Send-Cc:
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 527B
"\"\" W.Michael Petullo \" via RT\"" <rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu>
writes:

Show quoted text
> I have attached a patch against krb5 1.7 that fixes a symbol collision
> between krb5 and uClibc. This allows one to compile krb5 against uClibc.

Thanks. Why is there a definition of ruserpass() in uClibc? It looks
useful only to the ftp client. Should we use a system-provided copy
of ruserpass() if available? We might perform the function renaming
as an interim solution if we are going to attempt to use the system
version of the function.
# Sun Oct 11 03:22:21 2009 "W.Michael Petullo" <mike@flyn.org> - Comments added
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 03:22:20 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #6570] PATCH: Fix symbol collision between krb5 1.7 and uClibc
From: "W. Michael Petullo" <mike@flyn.org>
To: rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu
RT-Send-Cc:
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 701B
Show quoted text
>> I have attached a patch against krb5 1.7 that fixes a symbol collision
>> between krb5 and uClibc. This allows one to compile krb5 against uClibc.
>
> Thanks. Why is there a definition of ruserpass() in uClibc? It looks
> useful only to the ftp client. Should we use a system-provided copy
> of ruserpass() if available? We might perform the function renaming
> as an interim solution if we are going to attempt to use the system
> version of the function.

Here is the definition from uClibc's netdb.h:

/* ruserpass - remote password check.
This function also exists in glibc but is undocumented */
extern int ruserpass(const char *host, const char **aname, const char
**apass);

--
Mike
# Tue Dec 31 14:15:04 2013 tlyu (Taylor Yu) - Queue changed from krb5 to krb5-appl