From zacheiss@MIT.EDU Thu Sep 27 22:49:02 2001
Received: from pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.83])
by rt-11.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA18354
for <bugs@RT-11.mit.edu>; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:49:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from grand-central-station.mit.edu (GRAND-CENTRAL-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.82])
by pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id WAA18371
for <bugs@RT-11.mit.edu>; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:49:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from manawatu-mail-centre.mit.edu (MANAWATU-MAIL-CENTRE.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.85])
by grand-central-station.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id WAA18935
for <krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU>; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:47:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from coleco-sidewinder.mit.edu (COLECO-SIDEWINDER.MIT.EDU [18.187.2.149])
by manawatu-mail-centre.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id WAA22295
for <krb5-bugs@mit.edu>; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:47:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from zacheiss@localhost) by coleco-sidewinder.mit.edu (8.9.3)
id WAA11681; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:47:41 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200109280247.WAA11681@coleco-sidewinder.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:47:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: zacheiss@MIT.EDU
Reply-To: zacheiss@MIT.EDU
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: rcp man page bug
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.99
Architecture: sun4
the server side rcp runs. This in and of itself isn't a
problem, except -f is overloaded in some people's minds to mean
"forward tickets", causing some users to rcp -f and then wonder
why their rcp is hanging forever.
Scratch head.
explanatory text stating "this doesn't do what you think it
does".
Received: from pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.83])
by rt-11.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA18354
for <bugs@RT-11.mit.edu>; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:49:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from grand-central-station.mit.edu (GRAND-CENTRAL-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.82])
by pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id WAA18371
for <bugs@RT-11.mit.edu>; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:49:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from manawatu-mail-centre.mit.edu (MANAWATU-MAIL-CENTRE.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.85])
by grand-central-station.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id WAA18935
for <krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU>; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:47:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from coleco-sidewinder.mit.edu (COLECO-SIDEWINDER.MIT.EDU [18.187.2.149])
by manawatu-mail-centre.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id WAA22295
for <krb5-bugs@mit.edu>; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:47:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from zacheiss@localhost) by coleco-sidewinder.mit.edu (8.9.3)
id WAA11681; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:47:41 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200109280247.WAA11681@coleco-sidewinder.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:47:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: zacheiss@MIT.EDU
Reply-To: zacheiss@MIT.EDU
To: krb5-bugs@MIT.EDU
Subject: rcp man page bug
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.99
Show quoted text
>Number: 997
>Category: krb5-appl
>Synopsis: -f flag should be documented in rcp man page
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: krb5-unassigned
>State: open
>Class: doc-bug
>Submitter-Id: unknown
>Arrival-Date: Thu Sep 27 22:50:00 EDT 2001
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Garry Zacheiss
>Organization:
MIT>Category: krb5-appl
>Synopsis: -f flag should be documented in rcp man page
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: krb5-unassigned
>State: open
>Class: doc-bug
>Submitter-Id: unknown
>Arrival-Date: Thu Sep 27 22:50:00 EDT 2001
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Garry Zacheiss
>Organization:
Show quoted text
>Release: krb5-1.1.1 (and later)
>Environment:
System: SunOS coleco-sidewinder.mit.edu 5.8 Generic_108528-08 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-100>Environment:
Architecture: sun4
Show quoted text
>Description:
The rcp man page does not document the -f flag, which is whatthe server side rcp runs. This in and of itself isn't a
problem, except -f is overloaded in some people's minds to mean
"forward tickets", causing some users to rcp -f and then wonder
why their rcp is hanging forever.
Show quoted text
>How-To-Repeat:
rcp -f /etc/passwd root@host:/etc/passwdScratch head.
Show quoted text
>Fix:
The rcp man page should list the -f flag along with someexplanatory text stating "this doesn't do what you think it
does".
Show quoted text
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
>Unformatted: